Three Solutions to the Immigration Issue
How to Transcend Partisanship and Promote Freedom
by Oliver DeMille
Some Conservatives...
When President Obama announced that his administration won't
deport law-abiding illegal immigrants who came to the United States as
children, many conservatives said he did the right thing, including
conservative icon William Kristol of The
Weekly Standard.
In truth, Newt Gingrich proposed something similar during
the 2012 Republican primaries and President George W. Bush was a supporter of
more open immigration.
And while some conservatives are anti-immigrant, many want
America to continue to be a melting pot.
This split in the Republican Party is one reason many
Republicans have become independents in the past twelve years--because the GOP
too often seems to be against more openness for immigrants.
Today there are more independents than either Republicans or
Democrats, and this is a new development of the 21st Century.
I grew up being taught that there are two major political
views.
The Two Parties
In the conservative small town where I was raised, the two parties were often
referred to simply as the Freedom Party and the Government Party.
From this perspective, there are really only two sides to
everything in our politics: the Government view and the Freedom view.
I had several high school teachers who challenged this
thinking.
Though I never heard them call themselves by the labels "Republican,"
"Democrat," or "Libertarian," they took their teaching roles to heart and
frequently asked questions that made us really think. I was impressed with how
dedicated they were.
They were deep thinkers, and each inspired me to be a better
student because they cared about important ideas.
For example, one of them responded to a paper I submitted by
writing numerous questions in the margins.
Don't You Think You Should Read Them First?
I especially remember one of these comments: "If you're
going to argue that the Constitution is superior to the Communist Manifesto,
don't you think you should read them both first? I can tell you've only read
the Constitution, which is fine unless you're going to compare them."
I went home and asked my parents where one would find the
Communist Manifesto.
They weren't sure where to look, and this was before the
Internet, but we found a copy in an old collection of classics I had seen many
times on the top shelf of a big bookcase in the basement.
I marked it up with red pen, and when I was done I took it
and showed my teacher. He smiled, and then shared his view that Constitutional
society is much better than anything Communism has to offer. "But you can't
just assume it because other people say so," he said. "You have to do your homework."
Fast Forward to Today
We live in a world deeply divided by partisan views.
Many people judge the issues not so much by what they really
think but rather according to what their favorite party has to say on each
topic.
Fortunately, the Internet has fueled the growth of
independents who aren't attached to any party and of many within the parties
who think more independently than most in past generations.
Or, perhaps people always thought independently but in our generation
it is just more accepted to openly discuss views that differ from the party
line.
But the Freedom Party and the Government Party are still
around.
Only, in reality, it
seems more and more that both parties are actually Government Parties and
nobody is really the Freedom Party anymore.
Nowhere is this more apparent than on the issue of
immigration.
Both parties routinely promote Big Government solutions to
immigration, and the traditional Government Party (Democratic) is the only one
that seems to care about the freedom of immigrants.
That said, it has historically done very little to actually
help them.
All of this seems strange.
The United States is, after all, a nation of immigrants.
My ancestors came from Switzerland and France, and my wife's
ancestors came from England and Sweden, among other places.
Many of our predecessors came to America looking for
economic opportunity, others for political freedom.
But they were immigrants.
The thing is, when most of them came to America, they
weren't given any help except the one most important thing: freedom.
They became part of a nation where the words on the Statue
of Liberty declared:
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied
pomp...
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"[i]
Think About These Words
"Storied pomp" means aristocratic polices that keep some
people down and the upper classes in charge, and the poem declares that other
nations can keep such bureaucratic laws.
Instead, it promises, in America we'll take anyone, any time.
It's hard to be more direct than the words "huddled masses,"
"wretched refuse" or "homeless, tempest-tossed."
America boldly declared to the world: "If you need freedom
and opportunity, come to America."
We even flaunted it to the aristocratic, arrogant,
bureaucratic nations of eighteenth-century Europe by telling them that in
America we "lift our lamp beside the golden door!"
Of course, we had said all this in other words: "All men are
created equal," "We the people," "government by, of and for the people," and
"life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
America stood for freedom--and for a long time in history we really
meant it.
We Need a Party of Freedom Today
Not another Party of Big Government and certainly not more
supporters of More Regulation, More Government Spending, and Less Openness.
John Quincy Adams wrote the gold-standard for immigration
back in 1819:
"The American Republic invites
nobody to come. We will keep out nobody. Arrivals will suffer no disadvantages
as aliens. But they can expect no advantages either. Native-born and
foreign-born face equal opportunities. What happens to them depends entirely on
their individual ability and exertions, and on good fortune."[ii]
Note that the quote above was announced as the official
statement of the U.S. State Department.
One European observer wrote of this policy:
"There is something magnificent
about this declaration, penned by John Quincy Adams himself. It epitomizes the
spirit of laissez-faire libertarianism which pervaded every aspect of American
life at this time.... Libertarianism was, of course, based upon an underlying,
total self-confidence in the future of the country."[iii]
We have lost our confidence today, and in our fear some
worry that immigrants will come and take our jobs, wealth and nation.
But our economy is not a zero-sum game.
Our attitude should be the American attitude: "We are free,
and so we are unafraid. Good help is hard to find, so we'll be glad if
immigrants add value and productivity to our businesses and economy. They can
have these jobs; we'll build even more new businesses. The more freedom for
everyone, the better!"
That's the American way. Or, at least, it once was.
What We Once Believed
We once believed in freedom, we believed in free enterprise
economics, and we believed in openness.
We loved our freedom, and we thought all people in the world
would be better off in America.
We welcomed them, gave them freedom and nothing else, and
watched their successes turn to the benefit of us all.
We asked for nothing but freedom, and we wanted everyone to
have the same freedoms we enjoyed.
This is how freedom works.
I wish there was a
Freedom Party today that stood for, well, freedom.
Let's open up our legal immigration.
As long as immigrants can be successful, they'll benefit all
of us, and if they can't succeed they'll eventually go home.
Our problem isn't
that immigrants take our jobs, but that our anti-business regulations send too
many of our jobs and opportunities for entrepreneurship abroad.
We need to get our own financial house in order, and stop
blaming immigrants for our failed economic policies.
As for current immigration policy, we have at least two
major problems.
One is a Republican problem, and the other is a Democrat
problem.
First, we don't openly welcome immigrants today.
We have far too many voices denigrating and persecuting
those who come to our nation looking for freedom and prosperity; we have become
an Aristocracy of the Native-Born.
We seem to believe that somehow it is okay to promote
freedom for some while simultaneously urging the government to withhold it from
others.
Second, we tend to absorb immigrants immediately into a
welfare state.
The problem isn't with immigrants getting government welfare,
it's with a government that gives massive amounts of federally-sponsored welfare
at all.
Immigrants are iconic for their entrepreneurial spirit.
However, U.S. regulation and policy are a burden to all who
seek to provide for themselves and give jobs to others, and perhaps the most
vulnerable of would-be entrepreneurs are immigrants.
The disadvantaged--and everyone else--in our country would be
well-served by policies that encourage and reward entrepreneurs, and our
welfare roles would diminish - both from risk-taking business owners and from those
they employ.
To get things right, to once again become a city on the hill,
a beacon of freedom to the world, the United States needs a different national
attitude about immigrants.
We need to be happy when they come here, enjoy freedom, seek
prosperity and pass these blessings along to their families.
We should be honored
to meet people who have the courage to pull up ties and move to another country
to better support their families.
We should feel privileged
to know them, and we should be impressed and inspired by their courage.
We should see in them
the modern continuation of the freedom movement led by the pilgrims and
pioneers.
Of course, if anyone - immigrant or not - engages in criminal
behavior, we should respond accordingly; but if they are hard-working, law-abiding
people (and the large majority are), we want them in America.
That's what freedom is all about.
Our American history has long invited immigrants to join us,
partake in freedom, and help build America.
Freedom works, and we should want everyone to enjoy it.
That's what America is all about.
Where is the Party of Freedom today? As far as I can tell,
it doesn't exist anymore.
We have two Big Government Parties, one with an emphasis on
domestic welfare and the other with a focus on international programs.
There is a place for both views, but we also need another
perspective, one that truly promotes freedom.
Here's What we Should Do About Immigration:
·
First, we should secure our borders. This one
change would fix nearly all of the problems of alien crime and violence that
plague our border states. The problems caused by drug cartels and human
trafficking are not immigration issues; they are crime issues, and they negatively
affect the United States in New York, Chicago and many other places beyond the southern
border states. We must see to national security and law enforcement--and these should
not be confused with immigration policy.
·
Second, we must help the needy with sound
economic policies that create opportunity and reward individual effort.
Americans are a charitable people. Let's give private welfare the lead again
and end federal welfare (with its waste, abuses and inefficient distribution of
resources).
·
Third, we should open wide the door to legal
immigration. We should make it possible for pretty much any law-abiding person to
come to America and try to become successful. This is what we did in most of
America's history, and the whole nation greatly benefitted from such openness.
Millions of European, African, Asian and other people came
to America as immigrants, built businesses and lives and helped America become
great.
Only nations in
decline keep people in or keep people out, and nations that begin to keep
people in or out inevitably go into decline.
America became great because of the combination of freedom
and openness.
This is a reality. And if America keeps being stingy about
immigration policy, it will stay in decline.
This is a rule of world history. Openness goes with freedom,
and without openness freedom declines.
Let's get back to being a free nation, and the resulting
freedom will greatly benefit native-born Americans and foreign-born immigrants
alike.
There was a time when
America stood for freedom, real freedom, for everyone, when we opened our doors
to the world and were proud to offer them freedom.
We were bold back
then, ready to face anything, because we were free and we knew it.
We knew we could do
whatever was needed.
Freedom does that to people.
Decline, in contrast, turns us against others and makes us
fearful of many potential threats.
Whining about immigrants isn't worthy of our American potential.
They won't hold us down. We are holding ourselves down--especially
through too much government regulation.
We are a hardworking people, and it is time for a rebirth of
the attitudes of freedom.
It is time to become once again like past generations of
Americans: Bold. Confident. Optimistic. Assertive. Self-Possessed. Innovative.
Tenacious. Unafraid. Frugal. Inventive. Courageous. Entrepreneurial. Free.
President Obama, Tea-Party-favorite Marco Rubio, and most
recently Mitt Romney have all suggested more open policies of immigration, but
these are just a beginning of what we should do.
A New Attitude
We need a comprehensive change that gives hard-working,
freedom-loving people from around the world the opportunity to live in a truly
free nation.
And the most important step is to return government to the
levels outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
Most of all, we need a new attitude regarding immigrants.
Free nations in history are proud of their freedom, to the
point that they invite the oppressed of the world to join them and reap the
blessings of liberty.
When such nations begin feel closed or protective of their
freedoms, it is because their freedom is in jeopardy--not from immigrants but
from a government grown too big.
Our national problems are challenging, and at times they
seem impossible to fix, but in reality the solutions are simple.
Let's take a page from the greatest example of freedom in
history, America, and simply give freedom a try. Freedom matters. Freedom
works.
And freedom for a few, with the rest excluded, isn't really
freedom.
Oliver DeMille is the author of The Coming Aristocracy, FreedomShift: 3 Choices to Reclaim America's
Destiny, A Thomas Jefferson Education, and other books on freedom. His
latest book, 1913, will be available
in August 2012.
[i]
Emma Lazarus, The New Colossus, at
the base of the Statue of Liberty.
[ii]
John Quincy Adams, "U.S. State Department Prescript," 1819, Niles Weekly Register, 18 (1820).
Oliver is dedicated to promoting freedom through leadership education. He and his wife Rachel are raising their eight children in Cedar City, Utah.
Connect With Oliver: