Wisdom, not Anger: The Social Leader Daily

Published: Tue, 03/20/12

 
 
Email #287
   Social Leader Daily by Oliver DeMille
 

Wisdom, not Anger

 

For decades many voters have felt that no matter how they vote things hardly change.
 
Many feel that big changes are needed, and they only want to support aggressive voices who promise drastic improvement.
 
Moreover, they want those who have caused the current problems to feel punished--so voters gravitate toward hard-talking candidates.
 
This isn't likely to change any time soon.
 
Many voters are deeply frustrated and genuinely angry with numerous government policies that hurt the economy, and while they don't really want violence they don't feel understood or supported by moderate words, restrained plans, or relaxed rhetoric.
 
They want angry words, their candidates to win, and those they blame for all our problems to lose and lose painfully.
 
Many voters in both parties literally want the losers from the other party to feel humiliated.
 
Few would say this directly, and the educated class looks down on those who say such things openly, but this is the way the majority votes.
 
Madison foresaw such challenges when he called elections "peaceful revolutions"--not actually violent, but passionate and extreme like all true revolutions.[i]
 
The founders knew that in elections passions run deep, and they knew that lasting freedom depends on the wisdom of the people.
Madison wrote in Federalist Paper 1:
 
"[W]e, upon many occasions, see wise and good men on the wrong side of questions of the first magnitude to society. This circumstance...furnish[es] a lesson of moderation to those who are ever so much persuaded of their being in the right in any controversy."
And even those who are right, Madison continues, aren't always motivated for the right reasons:
 
"Ambition, avarice, personal animosity, party opposition, and many other motives...are apt to operate as well upon those who support as those who oppose the right side of a question."
 
Madison says that in every major national discussion,
 
"A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. To judge from the conduct of the opposing parties, we shall be led to conclude that that they will [promote the justness of their argument and] increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declarations and the bitterness of their invectives."

The only lasting solution, Madison says, is for the citizens to calmly and closely examine the details and apply their "sound and well-informed judgment."[ii]



[i] See The Federalist, paper 53.

[ii] The Federalist, paper 1.

Also by Oliver DeMille
 
 
Is American education preparing the future leaders our nation needs or merely struggling to teach basic literacy and job skills?
 
  Connect with Oliver & Get More Content
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Connect & Engage with CSL

 
 
   

 

Click the image below to download our free e-book: