One side of the modern debate seems committed to using
government force to fix our economic problems, even though all through history
free economies, minimal regulation and limited governments have always been the
forerunners and partners of economic success and high economic mobility.
It is simply amazing that we still haven't figured this out.
Perhaps the most astonishing thing about this debate is that anyone still
argues that more government force in our current model will spread more freedom,
prosperity, or social mobility.
There is no historical evidence for this, and
overwhelming evidence of the opposite.
Freedom works.
Why is anyone arguing that we give more
support to government force?
|